George Orwell, Doublethink, Iraq

Could We Split the Difference?

Dan Carpenter

Doublethink, as defined in George Orwell’s “1984,” is “the power of holding two contradictory beliefs in one’s mind simultaneously, while believing both of them.”

For example, the citizen-slaves of the novel’s Oceania were bombarded with the dual message that they were under constant threat of devastation from an implacable enemy while their own army was winning victory after glorious victory.

Real life in 2007 can be even more fanciful….

We’re assured that we’re winning in Iraq, and warned that it might well get worse….

A Long Way Gone — by Ismael Beah

Ishmael Beah Was Never Very Far Away
Dave Weich


Ishmael Beah became a soldier at age thirteen, one year after rebels attacked his village, flushing him into the forest to live on the run with a pack of other boys his age.

Dave: You write at length about Bra spider and Leleh Gombah and the ways that storytelling was a central part of your childhood. Beah: There was a strong oral tradition. Storytelling was not just entertainment. It was also a way to impart certain knowledge to the young, to impart the history of communities and cultures. And moral behavior, how to behave — all the stories had a moral underpinning or a message. This was how it was done. They told you a story and you walked around remembering.

Prison Arts Programs

Creating Behind the Razor Wire: An Overview of Arts in Corrections in the United States

By Krista Brune 

In the years since California first institutionalized its Arts-in-Corrections program with a line item in the state budget and staff positions within the Department of Corrections, various studies have investigated the value of arts programs for incarcerated populations. The often-cited 1983 Brewster Report, written by California State University San Jose sociology professor Lawrence Brewster, reviewed four institutions, showing that Arts-in-Corrections produced $228,522 in measurable benefits as compared with a cost to the department of $135,885. Among inmates who participated in the arts programs, Brewster found a 75 to 81 percent reduction of incident rates. The validity of this report has been questioned, yet it is one of the few quantitative reports supporting the practice of the arts in correctional facilities.

Iranian Artists Forum to honor Palestine’s Mahmoud Darwish

Iranian Artists Forum to honor Palestine’s Mahmoud Darwish

Ali Dehbashi, the managing director of the Iranian literary monthly Bokhara, is scheduled to deliver a lecture on the status of Palestinian poetry during the program entitled A Night with Mahmoud Darwish. 

Iranian translator of Arabic texts Musa Asvar is also slated to elaborate on the various aspects of Darwish’s poetry. 

The program will continue with a review of Darwish’s latest poems by Naser Zera’ati and the screening of the documentary film “Writers on the Borders: A Journey to Palestine”, directed by Samir Abdallah and Jose Reynes, with subtitles translated by Zera’ati. 

The documentary has a flashback to 2002 when eight internationally renowned writers, poets, and intellectuals, including American novelist Russell Banks and Nobel laureates Jose Saramago and Wole Soyinka, traveled to the West Bank and Gaza to visit Darwish and observe the state of the Palestinians living there.  

The 84-minute documentary alternates scenes from the writers’ journey with testimonials from the Palestinian people, readings by Darwish, and reflections from the concerned authors as they bear witness to what they see. 

Poet and writer Mohammadreza Shafiei Kadkani introduced Iranians to Darwish about three decades ago. 

Darwish, 66, is a contemporary Palestinian poet and writer of prose. He has published over thirty volumes of poetry and eight books of prose and has served as the editor of several publications.  

He is internationally recognized for his poetry, which focuses on his strong affection for his lost homeland. His work has won numerous awards and has been published in at least twenty languages.

A Review Of “Beasts of No Nation” by Uzodinma Iweala

by Nathaniel Jonet 

Beasts of No Nation is the first book by Uzodinma Iweala, a 23 year-old Nigerian born in America and raised in Washington, DC, England, and Nigeria. Iweala is a sub-Saharan Upton Sinclair, whose Jungle is not about dead rats and poison in your meat, but about dead families and poisoned dreams in your world. The beauty of this piece is that it takes a story we would glance past as it scrolled along the bottom of CNN news or change the channel when it broke in a short bulletin on the BBC and brings it up close and personal. Far too personal to be safe.

Witness: the inward testimony

Witness: the inward testimony

by Nadine Gordimer

The horror of Hiroshima and Nagasaki was part of the unspeakable horrors of a past war. It is now 2006: the world has come to coexist in, witness the horrors of Twin Towers New York, Madrid bombings, London underground train explosions, the dead in Afghanistan, Rwanda, Darfur, Sri Lanka…the list does not close.

What place, task, meaning will literature have in witness to disasters without precedence in the manner in which these destroy deliberately and pitilessly; the entire world become the front line of any and every conflict?

Fast Food Nation Review

The Ties That Bind America’s Food Chain

If you go to see “Fast Food Nation” with a group of friends, there is a good chance that someone — the smart-alecky contrarian; there’s one in every crowd — will bring up the subject of spinach.

Early in the film a fast-food executive named Don Anderson (Greg Kinnear) is dispatched to Colorado to investigate reports of E. coli bacteria — “fecal coloform counts off the charts!” — in his company’s beef supply. Since the movie, adapted by Richard Linklater and Eric Schlosser from Mr. Schlosser’s best-selling investigation of the industrial food chain and directed by Mr. Linklater, dwells on conditions in the feed lots and slaughterhouses where future hamburgers live and die, it can plausibly, if a bit glibly, be interpreted as a brief for vegetarianism.

Hence the impulse to point out that contaminated leafy greens have recently sickened more people than dirty meat. So there. A similar response was evident last spring in Cannes, where several American journalists bragged (or at least joked) about heading for the local McDonald’s after the “Fast Food Nation” screening, as if to prove they had resisted its lessons.

“Most people don’t like to be told what’s best for them,” says Bruce Willis in a sly, brilliant, single-scene cameo, and the suspicion that the movie is doing just that may provoke some reflexive resistance.

Which is too bad, because “Fast Food Nation,” while it does not shy away from making arguments and advancing a clear point of view, is far too rich and complicated to be understood as a simple, high-minded polemic. It is didactic, yes, but it’s also dialectical. While the climactic images of slaughter and butchery — filmed in an actual abattoir — may seem intended to spoil your appetite, Mr. Linklater and Mr. Schlosser have really undertaken a much deeper and more comprehensive critique of contemporary American life.

If it’s true that we are what we eat, then how, this film asks, do we even know who we are? The writer William S. Burroughs once contemplated “a frozen moment when everyone sees what is on the end of every fork,” and “Fast Food Nation” aims to produce a similar moment — to shock, to demystify and to force a kind of horrified, questioning clarity.

In what has become the preferred cinematic method for addressing complex social issues — see also “Crash,” “Traffic” and “Babel,” among others — Mr. Linklater’s film tells multiple stories, which radiate like spokes from the hub of a central theme. Don Anderson pokes around in fictional Cody, Colo., trying to balance his search for the truth with an apparent desire not to do anything that might hurt his career.

Meanwhile, a group of Mexican immigrants, having crossed the border illegally, arrives in Cody (Don unknowingly drives by the van transporting them) and takes up dangerous, stomach-turning jobs at the meat-processing plant. And a teenage burger-slinger (who works at one of Don’s franchises after school) undergoes a crisis of conscience when she falls in with a group of anticorporate activists from a nearby college.

Mr. Linklater is a nimble and versatile director, but what he does best — what he seems to like most — is to film people in conversation. His most characteristic movies — “Slacker,” “Before Sunset,” “Waking Life” — consist largely of unfettered, idiosyncratic talk, and “Fast Food Nation” is thick with debate, argument, rumination and repartee. Curiously enough, the talkiness is what saves the movie from turning into a lecture. Its loose, digressive rhythm keeps it tethered to reality, while the dialogue and the easy pace of the scenes allow the characters to register as individuals, not just as types.

It helps that the performances are generally strong. Mr. Kinnear is, yet again, the All-American dad and solid citizen, at once a paragon and a parody, thoroughly decent and just a bit sleazy. Ashley Johnson is completely convincing as Amber, the striving high school student whose idealism is the flip side of her ambition. The only thing Amber wants more than to change the world is to get out of Cody, and one of the film’s quiet insights is that these two desires — to fight the system and to win by its rules — are not necessarily incompatible, though they may seem contradictory.

In other words, when Amber and her newfound comrades sit around the dorm debating strategy and raging against the machine, they are attacking one version of the American dream while embodying another. A more basic instance of that dream motivates Raul (Wilmer Valderrama) and Sylvia (Catalina Sandino Moreno), a young married couple who have crossed the American-Mexican border on foot. While both actors are natural magnets for the sympathy of the audience, Mr. Linklater and Mr. Schlosser resist the impulse to turn them into caricatures of the noble, suffering poor. They are too interesting to be pitiable, just as Bobby Cannavale, as the predatory supervisor at the meat-packing plant, is more than just the sum of his ruthless, despicable actions.

The cast is large — there’s Ethan Hawke! And Kris Kristofferson! — but the crowdedness of “Fast Food Nation” is evidence of its liveliness. (Paul Dano, as one of Amber’s coworkers, and Ana Claudia Talancón, as Sylvia’s wayward sister, deserve special mention.) Everyone in it has something to say, and the central characters face some hard ethical choices set down by the logic of 21st-century consumer capitalism.

The movie does not neglect the mute, helpless suffering of the cows, but it also acknowledges the status anxiety of the managerial class, the aspirations of the working poor (legal and otherwise) and the frustrations of the dreaming young. It’s a mirror and a portrait, and a movie as necessary and nourishing as your next meal.

Election Day Work Strike — 2008?

Election Day Work Strike — 2008?

 

If there is ever time for a highly organized national general work strike in the US, it’s on Election Day — a one or two day strike to raise awareness and participation. It seems to me that progressive organizations across the country would do well to get together to encourage a strike — one that would help drive voter turnout, create educational opportunities, and also highlight the need to have Election Day be a general holiday.

A strike on Election Day could help highlight the ever increasing threat and reality of vote theft, vote suppression, and vote “stuffing” by way of electronic ballot machines, by way of under-resourced polling places, and by the many other means currently employed for eliminating votes and discouraging voters.

A successful progressive-led strike on and before election day could show badly needed progressive national leadership and action, unity and power — the value of grassroots democracy asserting itself.

The fact is that both the Democrat and Republican parties are deeply unpopular — as the polls and the voting rate make clear. Is it inconceivable that in the near future both parties may partially collapse and be forced to merge into one Owners Party that may then be fully challenged for power, and hopefully overwhelmed, by truly popular democracy parties? The polls show that on the vast majority of issues, a clear majority of Americans favor a far more progressive social democracy than today’s corporate rule.

Eliminate corporate money and corporate media and corporate culture — and it seems likely that the two dominant political parties of the owners would all but evaporate instantly. Easier said than done, of course. Corporatism is big power. But so was feudalism, and the serfs emancipated themselves from that — less than 150 and 100 years ago in places — and wrote off some of their monetary debt, so-called, in some cases all of it. Is it debt if individuals are forced to pay, and pay in the extreme, for the public goods and human rights that are health care and education and housing — in addition to many other cases where illegitimate and exorbitant charges are forcibly imposed, money which should not have to be forked over in the first place?

Every two, four, and six years it seems we have the opportunity to vote away our power to make decisions for ourselves. Every couple years we vote to let the two parties of the Owners wreak their will on the vast majority, while actual democracy parties are snuffed out by sheer financial force.

A progressive led general work strike on Election Day may be a good way to show the ability of people to act together as people of a democracy rather than as people who are owned.  

Related Articles:

How They Stole the Mid-Term Election” by Greg Palast

Election Night Guide” by Michael Schwartz

Related Action:

Youth Walk Out to Get Out of Iraq

With options so limited—the only choice for young people has been to educate, organize, and mobilize. The National Youth and Student Peace Coalition (NYSPC), the largest youth/student anti-war coalition in the country, is helping to organize what will be a powerful display of the youth and student movement for peace and justice. On November 7th, the day of the mid-term elections, young people across this country will “Walk Out to Get Out” of Iraq. NYSPC is calling for young people to walk out of their schools, their campuses, and their jobs, not only to go out and vote and to help others vote, but also to show the people in power that the youth and students of this country will not stand aside while they prioritize war and profit over our needs.

In the lead up to November 7th, students across this country organized educational events to highlight how this war is affecting young people. Through a variety of creative means, young people are spreading dissent from the northeast to the south. In New York City, a group called, Uptown Youth for Peace and Justice organized an open—microphone night, entitled “Politics, Poetry, and Peace” that focused on the poverty draft and military recruiters in our school through poetry and spoken word. In Fayetteville, Arkansas, a coalition of youth groups organized a march and rally to protest the war. And throughout the Midwest, members of Iraq Veterans Against the War told the truth about the war through their own personal experiences.

Nigerian Novelists, Politics

On Nigerian novelists: 

Conflict and corruption, exile and loss. The new novelists chronicling modern Nigeria and its place in the world shy from none of it….

“I set out to write books about Nigeria, and Nigeria happens to be a country in which politics plays a major role,” Adichie — now splitting her time between public readings for her new book and graduate classes at Yale — said in a telephone interview from her New Haven, Connecticut home.

Politics and literature are often linked. For Nigerians, the model is Soyinka, a larger than life figure with an actor’s flair for drama — he has appeared in his own plays — and shock of white hair to complete the image of passionate intellectual. Soyinka once single-handedly stormed a Nigerian radio station to try to prevent a corrupt politician from claiming an election victory. These days, Soyinka speaks out against what he sees as the dictatorial ambitions of Olusegun Obasanjo, a former military ruler turned civilian politician. Habila, who counts Soyinka among his influences, notes the Nobel literature laureate is “in his 70s and he’s still carrying placards in the streets of Lagos. “Most writers would have given up by their 70s — certainly given up on Nigeria. But not Soyinka. That’s a great lesson for people like me,” Habila said in an interview at the University of East Anglia in England….

Policing the Writers of Fiction

In “State Pulse: Maharashtra: Books as crime

‘Writers’ Police’ gives details of the way in which greatest writers of late 18th century who were living in Paris at that time were kept under surveillance….

…the Parisian police had a very specific agenda.

It was clear to these protectors of internal security of a tottering regime that the renowned literati then viz Victor Hugo, Balzac or Charles Dickens, might be writing fiction, but their sharp focus on the hypocrisy of the aristocrats or the livelihood issues of ordinary people is adding to the growing turmoil in the country. They knew very well that they might be writing fiction for the masses but it is turning out to be a sharp political edge that hit the right target and is becoming a catalyst for change.

While the Parisian police was engaged in tracking down the daily movements of the writers, its present day counterparts in Maharashtra especially from the Chandrapur-Nagpur region have rather devised some ‘easier’ and ‘shortcut routes’ to curb the flow of ideas. And for them it is also immaterial whether the writer in question was alive or dead.

The recent happenings at a book stall put in by a well known publisher ‘Daanish Books’ at the Deeksha Bhoomi of Dr Ambedkar in Nagpur are a case in point. A random list of books which the police perceived to be ‘dangerous’ and which it duly confiscated from their book stall makes interesting reading….

Coming back to the ‘Writers Police’, it is clear to everyone how all those meticulous efforts put in by the police to curtail the free flow of ideas proved futile. And how French revolution of those times emerged as a beacon of hope for thinking people across the world. Rather it could be said that all those efforts at surveillance became a precursor to the storming of the Bastille.

Can it then be said that India is on the verge of similar transformatory changes and the Maharashtra polices’ efforts at ‘criminalising writing’ are an indication that ruling elite of our times is fast losing ground.

Xican@ Demiurge: Chicano Art Today — Mark Vallen

From “Xican@ Demiurge: Chicano Art Today?”

http://www.art-for-a-change.com/blog/2006/10/xican-demiurge-chicano-art-today.html

by Mark Vallen

Art for a Change 

Historically, the Mexican American population in the western states of the U.S. endured the pains of a suffocating discrimination. In the mid-1960s, they rose to claim equality with the larger society, a struggle that entailed the right of self-identification – leading to the use of the term, “Chicano.” As a cultural identity and signifier of ethnic pride, “Chicano” is today more or less accepted by the mainstream, though the term is still evolving. Currently a number of Chicanos spell the word with an “X”, connecting their identity to ancient indigenous roots – in the Nahuatl language, the Aztecs called themselves Mexica (pronounced: meh-Shee-ka). Also, the gendered structure of the Spanish language has been rejected by some, who favor the written plural forms “Chicano/a” or “Chican@”.

Now that those basic facts have been made somewhat clear, allow me to open another can of worms – exactly what is Chicano art and how shall it be defined? Xican@ Demiurge attempts to form a definition, but as a survey it is stilted and woefully incomplete, in part because it’s extremely difficult to present the totality of Chicano aesthetics with a single exhibit. Chicano art necessarily arose from the tumultuous 60’s as a combative aesthetic in opposition to a system of racial, cultural, and political oppression – a cultural renaissance that took place concurrently with the Mexican American community’s political awakening. The California Ethnic and Multicultural Archives of the University of Santa Barbara, California (CEMA), describes the aesthetic in the following manner: “Chicano art is a public and political art, proclaiming and expressing public and social concerns in its themes and subjects.” That is not a description I’m inclined to argue against, though in all fairness it is one in need of further elaboration.

In their curatorial statement, the organizers of Xican@ Demiurge wrote: “Art that is innovative and aggressive in its approach is critical to developing a contemporary aesthetic that is representative of the 21st Century Xican@ artist. The cultural climate influencing this particular group today is not the same as the one that triggered ‘El Movimiento Chicano’ of the 1960’s.”

I’m left wondering how the art presented in this exhibit could be considered “aggressive in its approach”, unless the direction is one of insistent self-absorption, political retreat and apathy. The curators of Xican@ Demiurge take pains to point out that conditions currently facing Chicanos are not those of the 60s, which is true enough – but this seems an excuse not to address current realities more than anything else. Of the twenty-one artists in the exhibit, only one displayed a work addressing an overt political issue – and that attempt was not very engaging. The show nearly exists in a vacuum, as if one million Latinos did not march in the streets of Los Angeles to protest repressive immigration laws on May 1st, 2006, or that Latinos in the U.S. armed forces are not being wounded and killed in huge numbers in the pointless occupation of Iraq. The powerful tradition of Chicano art as an irrepressible force for social justice is almost nowhere to be found in this exhibit.

The Big Story

Put this in the Non Sequitur and I Wonder Why categories. Couldn’t possibly be because of the publishing industry:

“With the public still edgy from war and an uncertain economy, fiction continues to serve more as entertainment than enrichment. The big books have been escapist thrillers such as “The Da Vinci Code” and “The Historian,” and the fantasy blockbuster “Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince.” Not only have established literary authors disappointed critics, no major new literary voices have emerged.”

 –from “Book World Still Looking for This Year’s Big Story”

by Hillel Italie

Nobel Winner Orhan Pamuk and Guardian Links

Pamuk’s Nobel divides Turkey

Nicholas Birch

Twenty-four hours after Orhan Pamuk became the first ever Turkish writer to win the Nobel prize, reactions in Turkey are strangely mixed.His fellow artists have been overwhelmingly positive. Yasar Kemal, doyen of Turkish novelists and often tipped for the Nobel himself, emailed Pamuk to congratulate him for an award that he “thoroughly deserved”, while the winner of the 2003 Grand Jury prize at Cannes, Nuri Bilge Ceylan declared he was as happy as if he’d won it himself.

Others picked up on Pamuk’s suggestion that his award was above all a victory for all Turkish writers. “It’s a great opportunity for Turkey and Turkish literature to be better known by the world,” said the bestselling crime writer Ahmet Umit.Generosity has been in much shorter supply in Turkey’s mainstream media. “Should we be pleased or sad?” asked Fatih Altayli, editor of the mass circulation daily Sabah, in his Friday column.

… 

Some see the criticisms as simple jealousy on the part of a parochial-minded intelligentsia. Others present them as just the latest evidence of how much damage the authoritarian coup of 1980 did to Turkish society.

But the debate is also typical of the country’s elite: determined to be taken seriously on the international stage, but only on its own terms.

“It’s tragic really”, said Elif Shafak, another novelist brought to book under Article 301 last month. “This is a huge honour both for Pamuk and the country, and yet so many people are so politicised they forget about literature entirely.”
 

13.10.2006: Margaret Atwood: Pamuk is a Nobel winner for our times
13.10.2006: Maureen Freely: Pamuk receives the Nobel for being a writer, not his politics
13.10.2006: http://books.guardian.co.uk/nobelprize/story/0,,1921391,00.html
13.10.2006: Leader: Pamuk’s noble prize
03.04.2006: Interview with writer Orhan Pamuk
23.01.2006: Turkey draws back from prosecuting outspoken novelist
16.12.2005: Trial of Turkish author adjourned
16.12.2005: Leader: In praise of… Orhan Pamuk
24.04.2004: Orhan Pamuk on the road to rebellion
08.05.2004: Profile: Orhan Pamuk
Pamuk: The right choice?
06.08.2006:
The Black Book by Orhan Pamuk
17.04.2005: Istanbul by Orhan Pamuk
29.05.2004: Snow by Orhan Pamuk
15.09.2001: My Name is Red by Orhan Pamuk
12.03.2005: Istanbul by Orhan Pamuk
Orhan Pamuk author page
More about Orhan Pamuk on the Nobel prize site

Social Activist Photographer, Milton Rogovin

Famed Photographer Leaves Social-Activist Legacy for Son

by Jim Rankin

“Milton Rogovin told his audience at the Met, six years ago, “In the 1950s, when the federal government tried to silence those of us from organizing for the rights of working people, I refused to be silenced. I turned to social-documentary photography as my way of speaking out.”

“He was consciously following in the path of Jacob Riis, a muckraker, pioneering photojournalist and reformer who hoped his photographs would draw attention to deplorable conditions in the tenements of the early 20th century, and Walker Evans, who recorded rural poverty in Appalachia 30 years later.”

 …

“Mark Rogovin inherited his father’s artistic bent and political orientation, if not in all the details. As a young man, he studied with the great Mexican muralist David Siqueiros, in whose homeland it is generally assumed an artist doubles as a social activist.”

Hip Hop and Social Justice

Jay Woodson, Hip Hop’s Black Political Activism

“Other than the Convention and the Caucus, Hip Hop media, academia, artists and entertainers play a critical role in the development of a Hip Hop political current. Established opportunities are The Ave magazine, The Hip Hop journal, several Hip Hop oriented websites, and socio-politically just artists. Several liberal, progressive and radical organizations are providing space for politicized Hip Hop voices not only as artists but as panelists. Organizations People for the American Way and the Center for American Progress are including Hip Hop politicos as fellows, spokespersons and organizers.”

A Glimpse of Freedom

John Pilger,A Glimpse of Freedom“:

Last year, I interviewed Pablo Solón, son of the great Bolivian muralist Walter Solón, in an extraordinary room covered by his father’s epic brush strokes. More visceral than Diego Rivera’s images of the Mexican revolution, the pictures of injustice rage at you; the barbaric manipulation of people’s lives shall not pass, they say. Pablo Solón, now an adviser to the government of Evo Morales, said: “The story of Bolivia is not unlike so many resource-rich countries where the majority are very poor. It is the story of the government behind the government and what the American embassy allows, for in that building is the true source of power in this country. The US doesn’t have major investments here; what they fear is another Chávez; they don’t want the ‘bad example’ to spread to Ecuador and beyond – even to Nigeria, which might be inspired to tax the oil companies as never before. For the US, any genuine solution to poverty spells trouble.”

“How much would it cost to solve the poverty of Bolivia?” I asked.

“A billion dollars; it’s nothing. It’s the example that matters, because that’s the threat.”

The Power of Poetry

Stephen Burt at Slate writes,

“Is there a Howl for our own time, a cultural creation that explains, excites, antagonizes, and polarizes a wide swath of America? It could not be a poem. Recent poets and poems have become notorious (Amiri Baraka’s “Somebody Blew Up America”), or widely popular (“When I am an old woman I shall wear purple”), or critically acclaimed, but no poem has accomplished all three at once, nor blew open its moment, as Howl did. Films and records can still attain succès de scandale—think of Kids, Brokeback Mountain, or Slim Shadybut a poem on a page, or a book of poems, cannot.”

Sounds like a worthy challenge.

The problem with Burt’s assertion is that it is false, as far as anyone knows. That it may also be true as far as anyone knows is irrelevant, since the point is that no one can know, contrary to Burt’s flat assertion.

All it would take would be one lightning-in-a-bottle book of accomplished and resonant, say, antiwar poems to begin to be circulated among US troops in Iraq and then all across the US, and then you just might have it. And any number of scenarios with any variety of focus can be envisioned. (And, at the least, this sort of thing, as Burt notes, is seen to some considerable extent in certain lyric forms today, in rap not least, as well as in other art forms.)

The power of poetry — political, social, cultural, aesthetic.

Orwell’s Problem and Partisan Fiction

To help ground the weblog, over the next couple weeks I’ll excerpt from some of my articles on fiction and social change. At some point I may serialize an antiwar novel and other partisan fiction.

Speaking of which:

Orwell’s Problem and Partisan Fiction
An Obvious Deficiency — the Lack of Fact-Based Partisan Novels

…what about progressive partisan fiction? How about a great novel of ambition — literary or popular — portraying figures like some of the most ambitious and powerful strivers of our day: George Bush, Dick Cheney, Condi Rice, Colin Powell, Bill Clinton, Hillary Clinton, Madeleine Albright and others? There is a problem. Progressive partisan novels about such figures would have to be in definitive part scathing, well beyond what plenty of literary (and commercial) authors would find acceptable, since they generally support at least some of these figures, and their types, and if they do not, the dominant publishing houses and the dominant media do. This support of the status quo is very similar to what existed in the day of Orwell, with equally troubling implications for literature and the society and world it helps create. As Noam Chomsky notes:

About Orwell’s 1984, I thought, frankly, it was one of his worst books. Could barely finish it. Some parts (e.g., about Newspeak) were clever. But most of it seemed to me–well, trivial. The problem is not a very interesting one; the modes of thought control and repression in totalitarian societies are fairly transparent…