IMPRISONMENT AND RESISTANCE – course

Katy Ryan

I envision this class as a philosophical, political, and literary exploration of the U.S. prison system, primarily through twentieth-century American literary texts. The class emerges from some dismal facts and some hopeful developments. First, the dismal facts: the United States imprisons more of its population than any other country in the world, with over two million people living behind bars; more black American men are locked up today than are in college; women are the largest growing population in prison; supermaximums, created in the 1980s, deny inmates all human contact; and four million U.S. citizens are disenfranchised because of felony convictions. But there are hopeful signs, including a strong movement against mandatory minimum sentences, participated in by federal judges; ongoing state moratoria on the death penalty; and the implementation of alternative sentencing programs based on restorative models of justice. Our state of incarceration has resulted in the emergence of a new body of American literature. Bell Chevigny writes in her introduction to a recent PEN anthology, “The writing coming out of U.S. prisons has never been as strong, rich, diverse, and provocative as in the final quarter of the twentieth century.”    
     
In Part One, we will look at the history of prisons–when and where and why they emerged and how they have transformed. We will discuss economic considerations, both in terms of the for-profit prison industry and in terms of the corporate use of inmates’ labor. We will also address one of the most costly, in every way, prison practices: capital punishment. To conclude this section, we will read two memoirs that address, among other things, the persistence of racism in our legal system. Part Two will constitute the bulk of our reading, which comes from imaginative literature—novels, short stories, plays, and poems. In Part Three, we will look briefly at recent developments in the struggle to reform or abolish prisons. The literature of imprisonment is an enormous field, and some areas of study will necessarily be neglected. You are, of course, welcome to pursue these areas in your own research.

In addition to the observations you bring to the table each week, we will consider both literary and social questions: What might be the parameters for the genre, “prison literature”? How does it compare to other generic literary classifications? What might the field of literature contribute to discussions about public policy? To what extent does Foucault’s analysis of modern systems of surveillance apply to prisons in the United States? What impact should international standards of justice, like those articulated in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and the Geneva Conventions, have on the administration of American prisons, domestically and abroad? What should be the role of victims and victims’ families in the criminal justice system? To what extent do literary texts expose or perpetuate the lie that we must sympathize either with prisoners or with victims of crime, not with both, a divide that undermines our reason and our ability to make the changes necessary to reduce violent crime and reverse the devastation of mass imprisonment.

In November, we will have two guest speakers–Delbert Tibbs, a poet who was sentenced to die in Florida and exonerated after three years on death row, and my father, Bill Ryan, who helped to organize the moratorium on executions in Illinois and continues to advocate on behalf of men and women in prison.

Continue reading IMPRISONMENT AND RESISTANCE – course

Radical Theatre: The Roots of Social Action

Katy Ryan

 

Together we organize the world for ourselves, or at least we organize our understanding of it; we reflect it, refract it, criticize it, grieve over its savagery; and we help each other to discern, amidst the gathering dark, paths of resistance, pockets of peace, and places from whence hope may be plausibly expected. Marx was right: The smallest indivisible human unit is two people, not one; one is a fiction. From such nets of souls societies, the social world, human life springs. And also plays.

–Tony Kushner, afterword to Angels in America: Perestroika

In a recent New Republic Online review (7.13.05), theatre critic Lee Siegel wrote, “In truth, there’s little that theatre can do, even in the most extreme times, to achieve that golden chimera of the activist’s imagination.” And in a Wall Street Journal editorial (6.6.05), Terry Teachout, after observing that conservatives just don’t write plays, commented, “Any work of art that seeks to persuade an audience to take some specific form of external action, political or otherwise, tends to be bad. But the line is not a bright one, and it is possible to make good, even great art that is intended to serve as the persuasive instrument of an exterior purpose.”         

            This semester we will pursue a specific question: How successful have twentieth-century performances been at achieving desired political effects on local or national levels? Obviously, this is a difficult question to answer empirically. As Baz Kershaw notes in the introduction to The Politics of Performance (1992), “Any attempt to prove that this kind of performance efficacy is possible, let alone probable, is plagued by analytical difficulties and dangers.” Yet, we will see what kinds of measure are available as we read, discuss, and perform twentieth-century radical performances. With the word “radical,” I aim to describe performances that attempt to get at the “roots” of social practices and ideologies in order to effect progressive social change.

            We will begin with a brief introduction to performance studies, a complex, emerging field that incorporates the methods and insights of many disciplines, including anthropology, history, visual art, textual studies, philosophy, and drama. At a time when, in certain academic circles, the possibility of meaningful action is questioned and notions of subjectivity have been deeply troubled, performance has proven an enabling device for theorizing some kind of needed agency. Next, we will consider Bertolt Brecht’s epic theatre (predicated on not only the possibility but the necessity of action) and the impact of his theories on twentieth-century theatre, primarily but not exclusively American performances focused on liberation struggles—for people living under foreign occupation, workers, women, Chicano/as, and African Americans. We will study a range of international theatre collectives, concentrating on the developments of Augusto Boal’s Theatre of the Oppressed, as well as expressionistic theatre, documentary theatre, and performance art.

            In other words, we will be reading a lot of plays and encountering a wide-range of theatre practices—diverse in form, content, philosophy—that will allow us to think broadly about space and silence, experience and aesthetics, play and politics.

  Continue reading Radical Theatre: The Roots of Social Action

Lockdown Prison Heart

Table of Contents

Introduction                                          Renaldo Hudson                           

Editorial Note                                         Katy Ryan 

I’m Sorry                                              Joseph Dole
Anguish Like a Fire in my Heart                 Jeffrey Boswell
Every Tomorrow                                    George Whittington III
Second Chance                                     Guadalupe Navarro
Level E                                                Daniel Parker
A Secret Injustice                                  LaJuana Lampkins
No Longer a Prisoner                               Scott Caro
True Power                                           Donald McDonald
The Biggest Epidemic                              Marvis Alexis
Kidnapped                                            Aryules Bivens
Still Broken                                           Susan Daquila
Unseen Chains                                      Timothy N. Dickerson
The Work is Ahead                                 Donzel Digby
Drive Slow                                            Tyrone Fuller
Thoughts to Things                                Vincent Galloway
An Angry Street                                    Alan Garnett
Humanity is Never Lost                           Martell Gomez
Stop the Genocide                                 R. Lalo Gomez
Strive for Perfection                               Kirby Griffin
Optical Illusion                                      Stanley Howard
I Woke Up                                            Renaldo Hudson
Doing the Right Thing                             William Hudson
Dog-Eat-Dog                                        Raphael Jackson
That Bluebird Bus                                  Gerald James, Sr.
Open Your Minds and Hearts                    Keith Kimble
Wisdom                                               Ron Kliner
Momma’s Boy                                       Andrew Maxwell
If I Could                                             Gregory McMillan
Looking Back into the Mirror                    Tom Odle
God’s Grace                                         Roberto Ornelas
Forgotten Child                                     William Peeples
My Discovery                                       Larry Rodgers
Lil Lloyd                                              Lloyd Saterfield
Roller Coaster                                       Ricky Tilson
Odyssey                                              Shondell Walker
Coat of Many Colors                              Joseph N. Ward
Quest                                                 Eric Watkins
Mental Resurrection                              Ted Williams

Readers’ Comments                               Jennifer Jenkins-Bishop 
                                                         Jeff Flock 
                                                         Sister Helen Prejean 
                                                         Bill Ryan 
                                                         Katy Ryan
                                                         Eric Zorn
Introduction                                        Renaldo Hudson

___________________________________________________

Introduction

The concept for these essays came from a lesson I learned from Minister Farrakhan. He was teaching on the subject, Who are you, and are you good for nothing? This lesson on tape changed my life forever. So I wanted to give back from what I learned. I shared with Bill Ryan the idea to have an essay contest for Illinois prisoners, and he went about putting the judges and prize money together. Bill Ryan, we love you, and thank God for your heart and your willingness to continue working on our behalf.

I can tell you, the contest wasn’t about the money. I live here in the midst of these so-called “monsters.” Men came to me with smiles on their faces, like little children look on Christmas morning as they open gifts. They were saying, “Thank you, man. Sometime a brother just needs to be heard. Made to feel human again. The essay contest made me feel like a human again.”

I am extremely thrilled that we are able to share our thoughts and souls to the public in these essays. These men and women are so brave. I take my hat off to all of them. Daily, I hear the hearts of men losing hope and the will to live. At the same time, I see the growth in so many.

It is our hope that these essays will encourage others to think about who they are and what they can do better. We hope that you enjoy them as much as we did writing them. Please share them with as many people as you can. We want to grow. Help us to keep moving down the roads of positive change. May God bless.

-Renaldo Hudson

___________________________________________________ Continue reading Lockdown Prison Heart

Title America Novels

This is a partial list of novels by American authors with some variant of America or United States in the title, 1767 to 2003. These novels are not necessarily highly political, though a number are, and many have a relatively strong social focus. A few novels with America, etc., in the subtitle are also included here.
______________________________

 

The Female American
Anonymous; Unca Eliza Winkfield (pseudonym); Michelle Burnham (introduction); 1767
__________________________

 

Harriet Beecher Stowe, 1852
__________________________

Some classic fiction and social change

Antigone – Sophocles
Lysistrata – Aristophanes  [Lysistrata Project]
The Praise of Folly – Erasmus
Gulliver’s Travels – Jonathan Swift
“A Modest Proposal” – Jonathan Swift
“The War Prayer” – Mark Twain
The Iron Heel – Jack London
The Dispossessed – Ursula LeGuin
Ecotopia – Ernest Callenbach
Parable of the Sower – Octavia Butler
“The Ones Who Walk Away From Omelas” – Ursula LeGuin
“The School” – Donald Barthelme
“Please Attack Appalachia” – Mike Bryan
“The Complaint of Peace” – Erasmus
Les Miserables – Victor Hugo
Johnny Got His Gun – Dalton Trumbo
“The Yellow Wallpaper” – Charlotte Perkins Gilman
Woman on the Edge of Time – Marge Piercy
Wizard of the Crow – Ngugi wa Thiong’o

The Shape of Tomorrow – Deadline Iraq

revised 9/30 

Comments for “the President”? Go to: The Soldier Said to the President

The entire continuing Deadline Iraq series: here.

 

The Shape of Tomorrow:
Deadline Iraq

Baghdad, Iraq

“Oh great, here comes the Liar in Chief,” said Soldier One to Soldier Two at a desert-embalmed seemingly remote military base actually not far from Baghdad.

“How you two fellas doing?” said the President of the United States, strolling over with an entourage that billowed around him, a cloud of cavalry made up of administrative, military, and media personnel. The President dressed in desert-wear Army camouflage thought it all a great photo op.

“Just fine, Sir.” Soldier One extended her peg arm to the President. Her hand and forearm had been blown apart by a roadside bomb. She was off duty now wearing a wooden peg because she was still spooked by the metal claws that made for her new active duty fingers and by the synthetic flesh of her modeled prosthetic hand.

So the President shook her peg. “Good, good, that’s good to hear.” He turned to Soldier Two who took a half step forward on his wooden peg, hidden in his boot, to more firmly grasp the hand of the President.

“We’re ‘living the dream’, Sir.” He stared the president in the eye, his look lively, unsmiling. Continue reading The Shape of Tomorrow – Deadline Iraq

Little Rock and Central High – 40 & 50 years on

 News from Little Rock

Timeline of Little Rock public schools desegregation

Your door is shut against my face,
And I am sharp as steel with discontent.

Claude McKay, “The White House” 

What happens to a dream deferred?
…does it explode?
Langston Hughes, “Harlem” 

My days are not their days…
My ways are not their ways…
I don’t think they dare
to think of that: no:
I’m fairly certain they don’t think of that at all.
James Baldwin, “Staggerlee wonders” 

The biggest News I do not dare
Telegraph to the Editor’s chair:
“They are like people everywhere.”

The angry Editor would reply
In hundred harryings of Why
Gwendolyn Brooks, “The Chicago Defender Sends a Man to Little Rock,” a poem that describes life in Little Rock, Arkansas in 1957 when Central High School became the site of the first federally-enforced court-ordered school integration.  

Forty years later, President Clinton returned to his home state to commemorate the occasion, while essentially ignoring the poverty and resultant violence in the area. During the first three days of Clinton’s four day stay, four young men aged 17 to 23 were murdered in Little Rock not far from Central High School – an outbreak of violence that had been foreshadowed less than two months earlier by a drive-by shooting near Central High that was the third such shooting in a five-day period which also saw the killings of four other youths. The murders and poverty went virtually unreported, as usual. The slain – Brian Young, 19; Derrick Mcbride, 17; Jamarco Woods, 23; Melvin Morning, 23; Mark Green, 26; Shameka Moore, 16; Antoine Harris, 18; Tony Davis, 20. 

I.

Historical the print deluge not once before nor since so huge – the president preached claimed he cared – emotion trite and tripe none spared  

at Central High in Little Rock where justice first was forced and won. Reporters praised in nonstop talk the proud returning native son –  

so sanguine suave a specious bit on stage displayed – adorned bright lit – sleek mugging presidential tears for racial gains of forty years.  

He harkened to the Mayflower – he mentioned Ellis Island too. To sanction patriotic power he flung around clichés half true.  

He lauded then the Little Rock Nine (and rightly so their story told how brave they crossed the color line thus much deserving glory bold)  

but spoke no word at Central’s door about reversing flight from poor though wealth had fled from center town – of monied flight he’d not talk down.  

The city splashed fresh paint around to try to make the streets look swell – a surface fix meant to confound to fool the cameras fool them well.  Continue reading Little Rock and Central High – 40 & 50 years on

Orwell’s Problem and Partisan Fiction

An Obvious Deficiency – the Lack of Fact-Based Partisan Novels 

Is the antiwar movement “flat on its back” as some fairly prominent progressive workers have commented? If so, or if it is at least less effective than it could be and should be, is this due in part to the fact that the antiwar movement (like progressive movements generally) fails to take much advantage of fact-based partisan fiction? Fails to produce fiction that might more fully and powerfully reveal reality and possibilities for change than the comparative flood of essays and commentaries and nonfiction books currently produced? Isn’t there an extreme and indefensible imbalance between the types of progressive writing available to not only progressive workers but to the entire society and culture itself? Continue reading Orwell’s Problem and Partisan Fiction

The Power of Political Fiction

An Interview with Tony Christini by Mike Palecek

[Initial questions by Mike Palecek. Other questions supplemented, per request.]


Q: Why use fiction as a tool for social change?

Fiction can be engaging and effective as a tool for social change. How do we know? Lots of ways – including careful studies such as Michael Hanne’s book The Power of the Story: Fiction and Political Change that document the extensive social, political, and cultural effects of “political fiction” and the ways in which governments and individuals have used and feared and counted on the public (and private) power of political fiction.  Take the case of Pakistan today which has banned all fiction imports from India. Pakistan has no such wholesale ban on nonfiction (“technical, professional, and religious” nonfiction books are allowed). Even if the author is Pakistani but the book was published in India, it’s disallowed, apparently because the state of Pakistan fears that the power and influence of fiction will undermine its control. In this case, fiction is even more feared than nonfiction. And why shouldn’t it be, given its very influential history and nature, in public and private realms both?  Continue reading The Power of Political Fiction

Robert Parry on MoveOn and the Struggle to Build Progressive Media and Publishing

MoveOn & Media Double Standards” by Robert Parry: 

MoveOn.org’s “General Betray Us” ad may have gotten more attention than it deserved, but it also has underscored several important points: the foolishness of MoveOn’s ad-buying strategy, the cringing hypocrisy of the mainstream U.S. news media when attacked by the Right, and the pressing need to build independent news outlets.

Barbara Kingsolver’s Bellwether Prize underscores similar weakness in publishing, as I’ve detailed previously.

Antiwar Novel Johnny Got His Gun Newly Filmed

Posted by “Renata”: 

Greenwood Hill Productions has completed principal photography on a feature film based on Dalton Trumbo’s classic anti-war novel Johnny Got His Gun starring Ben McKenzie.

The movie is a new film version of the novel based on the 1982 Off-Broadway play which starred Jeff Daniels, rather than a remake of the 1971 feature which Trumbo wrote and directed.

McKenzie plays ‘Joe Bonham,’ a young American soldier hit by an artillery shell on the last day of the First World War. As a quadruple amputee who has also lost his eyes, ears, nose and mouth, he lies in a hospital bed but remains conscious and able to reason, all the while struggling to communicate with the outside world. The film explores the interplay between science, medicine, religion, and politics….

Bradley Rand Smith adapted the play from Trumbo’s award-winning 1939 novel. Since that time the book has sold 100 millions of copies having been printed in 40 separate editions in 30 different languages; the most recent in July 2007 with a new forward written by Cindy Sheehan, whose solider son died in Iraq on April 4, 2004. The one-person stage play, Dalton Trumbo’s JOHNNY GOT HIS GUN, was first presented Off-Broadway in 1982 at the Circle Repertory Theatre winning Jeff Daniels won an Obie Award for his solo performance. Continue reading Antiwar Novel Johnny Got His Gun Newly Filmed

The Ghost – by Robert Harris

Ghost writer with the inside edge– by Jay Rayner: 

Robert Harris knows a thing or two about political intrigue. As a journalist, he has reported on it. As the author of novels such as Fatherland and Imperium, he has weaved compelling narratives from it. Now, with his new book, he is the cause of it. The Ghost, which is published this week, tells the story of Adam Lang, a recently retired British Prime Minister, brought low by an unpopular and possibly illegal Middle Eastern war, who is holed up in a media mogul’s house on Martha’s Vineyard, explaining himself to the ghost writer who is penning his memoirs. In the background is his Machiavellian wife Ruth and a load of thriller subplots involving possible assassinations, the workings of the CIA and the PM conniving with the practice of extraordinary rendition.

While Lang’s political allegiance is never named, it does not take a huge leap of imagination to see this as a fictionalised attempt by Harris to stab Tony and Cherie Blair firmly in the front. Sure, as a political journalist, he was quite the cheerleader for the Labour leader. He has long been credited with having spotted the MP for Sedgefield’s talents long before others realised his potential and during the 1997 election he was granted unprecedented access. He was even on the plane as the Prime Minister-to-be headed for victory.

But they fell out spectacularly, first over Blair’s treatment of Harris’s old friend, Peter Mandelson, when he was forced to resign for the second time in 2001, and later over the Iraq war, to which he was vehemently opposed.

Louis Auchincloss, Iraq, Novels, Politics

 Article by Trevor Butterworth from Huffington Post:

Recently, I had the pleasure to interview Louis Auchincloss, one of the great American novelists, and undoubtedly the greatest American novelist of power, money and politics. He was almost constitutionally incapable of talking about the war in Iraq but he did draw some interesting parallels with Vietnam, and specifically, the class of patrician who “pushed” that “disgusting” war. The following extract is from my profile of Auchincloss in the Sept 22nd Financial Times:

“I used to say to my father,” he says,”‘If my class at Yale ran this country, we would have no problems.’ And the irony of my life is that they did.” He pauses before invoking a 20th-century American foreign policy who’s who: “There was Cy Vance, Bill Scranton, Ted Beale, both Bundys, Bill and McGeorge — they all got behind that war in Vietnam and they pushed it as far as they could. And we lost a quarter of a million men. They were all idealistic, good, virtuous,” says Auchincloss, “the finest men you could find. It was the most disillusioning thing that happened in my life.”

Auchincloss has struggled to understand just how their shared patrician background could have produced this disconnect. And the answer would appear to be that wars are lost, if not always made, on the playing fields of New England. “Bill Bundy and I shared a study at Groton, and one day he came in from a football game, and I said: ‘Who won?’ and he said: ‘We lost,’ and then he burst into tears. You cannot lose. Groton cannot lose. That’s what they believed in, no matter what,” explains Auchincloss. “They all would have all been willing to die, if they hadn’t already been in high positions. They believed America cannot lose. We stand for every virtue and right that’s in the world.”

For more, including his excretory dismissal of the Bush family, read The Irony of my life.” But if you are a political junkie, his 1980 novel, The House of the Prophet, whose protagonist is based on Walter Lippmann, is an indispensable meditation on the motivations and failings of the political pundit and public intellectual class.

In the Valley of Elah critique

 Excerpt from “Mystery or Iraq war film” by Godfrey Cheshire:

As Crash did, though in a much different way, Haggis’ latest suggests a filmmaker whose sensibility is rooted in television. Indeed, the workmanlike earnestness of In the Valley of Elah would be right at home on TV. The one area where it excels, and I believe earns a place on the big screen, is the acting. Jones, who’s capable in most circumstances, here surpasses himself with a performance that shrewdly combines anger, dismay and steely resolve. Always commanding and ingeniously resourceful, his work receives very able support from Theron and the young actors who play the soldiers.

Ultimately, the film makes you wonder whether any salient tragic or political point can emerge from a movie so bound up with the mechanics of genre. When Robert Altman wanted to analyze America’s Vietnam morass in M*A*S*H, he did so by undermining rather than respecting the conventions of the war movie. When Hal Ashby set out to examine the war’s impact at home in Coming Home, he focused on an intimate, interpersonal drama and kept the genre gear-cranking to a minimum.

Strategies such as these, it seems, are virtually inevitable for anyone attempting to insert challenging insights into the formulas of entertainment. As you might expect, Haggis’ film hinges on how the psychological damage that soldiers experience in Iraq is brought home, sometimes with disastrous consequences. On the human level, that is worth considering, of course. But as dramatic analysis, it is hardly novel or profound, nor is it articulated in a way that connects it to deeper defects in American society.

Yet the real problem is that it is not essential to the drama of In the Valley of Elah. When the film is over, you realize you’ve been through a crime drama slash mystery that unfolds, builds and resolves according to convention—the implications regarding the Iraq war are interesting, perhaps, but incidental. You can easily ignore them because they are not central to the experience of watching the movie.

Haggis’ enterprise might also be faulted for focusing on the damage done to Americans, with only sidelong glimpses at the devastation visited upon Iraqis. But I would approach this bias by noting how clueless Haggis seems to be regarding the metaphorical implications of the film’s title.

The valley of Elah, we are told, is the place in the Bible (and Koran) where David did battle with Goliath. Haggis uses this tale to suggest that every American soldier going into battle is a David whose first enemies are his own fears. In other wars, this might have been a poignant little symbol, but in the current war it seems bizarrely out of place. While we may want to cling to the traditional symbolism, most of the rest of the world understands that, in Iraq, America is Goliath. We still await the artist who can make us confront that supremely discomfiting truth head-on.

Flags – Iraq War play by Jane Martin

Charles Isherwood: 

As fake news announcers (three flat-screen televisions adorn the stage), they segue from enumerating the latest stats from Iraq to announcing the sales of Harry Potter books. In graver voices, they intone things like:

When our children
in service to slogans perish
Do we mourn them
Knowing they died well?
And are we comforted?

Revisiting the Canon Wars – by Rachel Donadio

Donadio writes:

“Today it’s generally agreed that the multiculturalists won the canon wars. Reading lists were broadened to include more works by women and minority writers, and most scholars consider that a positive development.”

As I wrote at “Leftward Whoa! the Academy” – the institutions still have a long way to go:

“As I’ve mentioned previously, repeatedly, good strides have been made in other areas, in particular in regard to multicultural issues, in realms sometimes known as “identity politics,” thought and experience. But consider, in how many courses next year and in these past several years have students a chance to read and consider an explicit investigative antiwar novel about the ongoing US invasion and occupation of Iraq, one of the greatest calamities of our time for which our country is responsible? The answer is none, apparently. And precious few if any such novels were written for the Vietnam War, the Korean War, and World War II. And where is the criticism of that lack? Again, this example by itself doesn’t prove anything but is indicative of a general great failing of literature departments and the literary establishment as a whole (i.e., publishers, reviewers, writers and so on), which I’ve written about at length elsewhere.”