RSS Feed

Tag Archives: novels

How to Write a Novel?

Posted on

As an undergraduate I attended a writer’s talk, sponsored by an undergraduate writing group, titled How to Write a Novel. I went with a friend who also aspired to write a novel or more. We hoped to learn how that evening. Unfortunately, the author, who went on to direct multiple Creative Writing programs, did not appear to be aware of the announced title of his presentation. Instead of any explanation or analysis or even sheer speculation about how to write a novel, he talked generally about his life and career in relationship to his multiple books – the contextual whens and wheres and whats of his novels, volumes of poetry, and memoirs. No mention of how. Not much mention even of novel.

Over the years, as I attended numerous creative writing classes, listened to many writers talk and earned a degree in fiction writing, it occasionally struck me as surprising and too bad that I never again came across a talk titled How to Write a Novel.

So, how to do it?

First, whether age 16 or 26 or 56 or 86, if you experience life as broadly and deeply as you might well do, you will be able to draw on experience to create the art and the experience that is any story, or novel.

Second, if you educate yourself about people and the world in ways both wide and profound, such knowledge will feed and infuse the experience you bring to a novel.

Third, if you read many novels with great care and eagerness or disdain, and if you learn about their authors and why, when, and how they wrote the works they did, such experience and knowledge will help you to understand what you might do yourself, and how it might take off from what has been previously experienced and known.

Fourth, write.

And this is where many get stuck. If you write toward some inspiration, whether it be some fascination with specific place, or event, or type of person, or some vital moral or beautiful ideal, then you will find movement and motivation for your work. What inspires you? What do you live for? What do you read for? What would you valuing seeing more of in print? What can you contribute toward those ends? What makes your heart leap, your mind quicken, your blood boil? What is your purpose in writing? Write to that. Get the content down that moves and motivates you and your world.

Fifth, understand what you have written, to understand what you might yet write. Periodically, reread carefully, the first sentence, the first paragraph, the first page, and overview the whole thing to see again or for the first time what is going on, and how the story lives or dies, what makes it move or falter, where it might have gone and might yet go.

Novels have a lot of stuff in them, a lot of common and some uncommon facts of life, a lot of experience, a lot of feeling of one kind or another for people, for character and characters, for places and social relations, for groupings and cultural situations, for events and times, full of atmosphere and exploration, of explanation both explicit and implied, a lot of showing and telling about who did what to whom under which circumstances and why. Novels tell a large story either to some vital purpose or out of some needful birth of expression, or both.

So consider, reconsider, and decide as best you can what are you doing and why are you doing it and how well is it going, and whether or not that can be seen by a wide readership in the first sentence or two, in the first paragraph, in the first page? Does a story unfold throughout? Does it catch readers up and sweep them through? If not, why not? Address the weaknesses. Sometimes that means starting over. Or coming back to the work later.

You may find yourself repeatedly coming back to the question, Why do I write? Or who do I write for? Only you can answer such questions, though as with so much of life it can only be answered in consideration of and often in discussion with others, because whether or not you think you write for anyone, you always write among others. It’s a shared world. At its best, novel writing is not for the uncurious, nor for the fearful. Some novelists take nonfiction forms as their models for writing, such as biographies, autobiographies, travelogues, histories, journals and logs, interviews, letter exchanges…also diaries, in which case it might seem that such novelists are only interested in writing about themselves. Not so. The most interesting and valuable diaries are those written by writers, however private, who have a deep interest in the surrounding large world and the people within it. Sometimes that large world has been thrust upon them, and they turn to diary to help make sense of it, to cope. That they write for themselves does not mean they write strictly about themselves but greatly about the world and the people in it.

Sixth, once you have some sense of what you are doing in a story, or what you have accomplished in a short section, then how do you continue? How does one write at length? Significant length presumes a significant experience, often in liveliness, power, and accumulated meaning.

Take a look with a keen eye at the first section or so that you write. First, is it engaging, lively in many ways, in any way? Second, is it powerful at all? If so, great. If not, why not, and what can you do about it? Does it hold together well? Does it fly apart to any purpose. What holds together, what meaningfully coheres, has been accomplished, at least for the time being. What flies apart, what leads and lifts off in various directions, provides grounds for further exploration.

To write at length, the work does well to be more or less powerful and compelling. Lively or somehow engaging. And the story needs to be that again and again, only different and moreso, that is, in growing new relation to what came before. That’s how one writes at length. Every novel grows from the page or pages that come before it, though sometimes in very tangential ways. For a novel to become a novel, to grow from a short section, the short section must be accomplished as noted, and then the novel must change. Something must be different. Something must be added or subtracted, multiplied or divided – whether in character, place, event, or other focus. The imagination keeps going by incorporating these significant differences, expanding from the original section or abandoning it – transcending by continuous creation – sometimes substituting the original section with a new beginning that might lead to a greater or more fitting and effective end. (Not that new beginnings and endings can save a novel that fails to live throughout.) A lot changes in a novel. We tend to think of novels as a thing, a great tale, all of piece, but novels are a series of changes, brought together with some overall co-ordination or intent in the telling. Novels are verbs. Novels are in the verbs, in new actions, new thoughts, and new impulses that both illuminate and transcend old actions and modes of being.

Have we covered it, How to Write a Novel? In one way, at least.  “Once upon a time…” “Once upon a land…” “Once upon a person…” “Once upon an occasion…” “Once upon a moment…” Something valuable occured worth illuminating, approaching, exploring.

Novels tell of the time a creator wishes to explore – when and where and with whom and what began, and how it all came to its engaging and compelling end. Write toward what compels, with purpose and passion.

Homefront online

Posted on

Footnotes to the Conquest: Iraq War Novels and Movies

Posted on

The media is full of articles stating that Iraq war movies and films (the fiction features) have not done well at the box office, but compared to the relative lack of, say, Hurricane Katrina movies, or, say, the ongoing national slaughter of the impoverished by the impoverishers movies, the growing numbers of Iraq war movies, by their very existence alone, are doing extremely well.

Far more such movies have been made now than were remotely ever made about the Vietnam war at a comparable time. And far more people see most any of these movies than see most any such documentary. But it’s no cause for celebration, far from it, because these movies are very careful not to be too “antiwar,” too revealing of the basic illegality and immorality of the US conquest of Iraq.

Read the rest of this entry

This Our Age of Consumption

Posted on

I know it may seem ironic, but I can assure you it is not, to have the Secretary of Consumption ascend to become President of the Holy Learned Corporate States of America – the former US of A.

Quite a coincidence that the first few fellers in line for the Presidency all died accidentally on the same day the president succumbed to food poisoning. And then the next few fellers in line declared they would resign rather than serve a minute as President, and so, quite unexpectedly, the Presidency fell to me, the Secretary of Consumption. Who would’ve thought? I of course accepted this most honorable position, with relish, and with a celebratory feast, in which I was roundly toasted: “A man of your time, Mr. President Consumption!”

Read the rest of this entry

Fiction and the Left

Posted on

On the left in North America, the novel kind of died or was killed a long time ago, if nowhere else. Upton Sinclair’s The Jungle was not only first published in serial form in a left periodical, his research for the novel was funded by it – by the socialist newspaper, The Appeal to Reason. I’m aware of no left news periodicals that are regularly running partisan liberatory fiction. Liberation Lit is one of the few left journals of any type that runs much progressive partisan fiction, and that consciously seeks it out.

Left periodicals might find it ever more to their benefit to run Lib Lit type fiction because, at least compared to nonfiction, it reads better in print than online. Moreover, a lot of nonfiction is actually more useful online than in print, by far; whereas, probably the opposite is true for fiction, with the exception of microfiction. Plus, running liberatory fiction would give left news outlets a comparative advantage over the many news outlets that don’t run any fiction at all, or very little.

Read the rest of this entry

New Mainstay Press site

Posted on

Mainstay books:

Short Order Frame Up – by Ron Jacobs

Homefront – by Tony Christini

Point of No Return – by Andre Vltchek

 Cover Image      Cover Image      Cover Image

Edwidge Danticat on Art and Injustice

Posted on

Haitian repression inspires Danticat

by Reilly Kiernan, The Daily Princetonian

An immigrant author must be brave enough to “create dangerously,” said Haitian writer Edwidge Danticat, who delivered the second annual Toni Morrison Lecture last night in Richardson Auditorium and received a standing ovation from the audience.

Danticat discussed how dealing with injustice in her native Haiti inspired her writing and cultivated her belief in the importance of art in coping with oppression and conflict.

Read the rest of this entry

Political Literary Criticism: 1903-2003

Posted on

Some brief excerpts:

(1903) Frank Norris, The Responsibilities of the Novelist: “[The novel] may be a great force, that works together with the pulpit and the universities for the good of the people, fearlessly proving that power is abused, that the strong grind the faces of the weak, that an evil tree is still growing in the midst of the garden, that undoing follows hard upon unrighteousness, that the course of Empire is not yet finished, and that the races of men have yet to work out their destiny in those great and terrible movements that crush and grind and rend asunder the pillars of the houses of the nations.”

Read the rest of this entry

Public Effects of Fiction

Posted on

P. D. Smith:

…Ken Kolsbun’s new book, Peace: The Biography of a Symbol. There’s also a fascinating article about it on the BBC.

They interview peace historian Lawrence S. Wittner who says that “it is still the dominant peace sign,” a fact partly due to its beautiful simplicity. It’s perfect for spraying on walls and is a universally recognised symbol of peace and resistance to repression.

Read the rest of this entry

Iraq War Novels and Iraq Conquest Novels – Where They Are and Are Not

Posted on

“Where’s the first wave of Iraq War fiction?” – asked at Paper Cuts: A Blog About Books, at the New York Times

There are number of good comments there on a variety of matters, though some that are wanting. In answer to that central question, the first waves of Iraq War fiction are in the movies, on TV, in plays and novels and short stories… While there is not nearly as much as one might hope to see, it hasn’t been too difficult to compile a list of dozens of such works, plus works on closely connected US militancy in the “Middle East,” Afghanistan in particular: http://apragmaticpolicy.wordpress.com/2007/11/05/iraq-war-fiction-3/

Read the rest of this entry

Sociology, Art, Health – Susan Bell

Posted on

 ”Talking Bodies“:

“Works of art can anchor social movements,” says Bell, Bowdoin’s A. Myrick Freeman Professor of Social Sciences. “Think of the AIDS quilt, or the Clothesline Project that is used to bring attention to issues of sexual assault and domestic violence against women. Images can be a powerful way to signal, engage, shock. People respond viscerally. It opens up a conversation.”

In a surprising twist on her discipline, Bell has turned to analyses of works of art to guide her in her research. In recent publications in journals including Health, Sociology of Health and Illness, and Qualitative Research in Psychology, Bell has made a case for incorporating the analysis of visual narratives into sociological work as documents and barometers of human experience.

Betsy Hartmann Novel – Deadly Election

Posted on

Betsy Hartmann on her new political thriller, Deadly Election:

In Deadly Election I explore what would happen if a right-wing administration in Washington definitively crossed the line between democracy and dictatorship.  What steps would they take?  Who would resist them?  The book is also about the frailties and strengths of the human character, of both villains and heroes alike.  As a novelist, I’ve always been interested in how political passions shape personal choices and how an unchecked lust for power has a corrosive influence on individuals.  The book’s a fast, scary read, but the characters are multi-dimensional and their stories intertwine in interesting and unanticipated ways.  

Ishmael Reed Interviewed by Wajahat Ali

Posted on

 via Counterpunch:

ALI: It’s amazing how all the best selling Urban Ghetto writers – they’re all White.

REED: Right. “The Lords of Urban Fiction.” What I can’t understand why Blacks can’t achieve royal status when it comes to forms that they have largely created? I mean there’s a White King of Rock n’ Roll, there’s a White King of Jazz, how come we can never achieve titles of royalty in these fields we are supposed to prevail in? They held a so called Rock and Roll Hall of Fame the other night, where White judges credit people who resemble them with the invention of Rock and Roll. I didn’t even see Blacks in the audience.

There would be no Rock and Roll without Ike Turner, James Brown, Chuck Berry, Fats Domino, Allen Toussaint, etc. Fake ghetto books and fake ghetto music. Elvis Presley, whom they idol, is merely a karaoke makeover of James Brown and Chuck Berry.

On Brian De Palma’s Redacted

Posted on

Peter Bradshaw:

Perhaps without quite realising it, De Palma is applying his extensively developed idiom of slash, splatter and gore. After a while, Redacted starts to feel like a sort of politicised exploitation-horror picture. I am still not entirely sure if it is just the director’s default position for representing violence, or if the wayward genius in him senses that, in the era of Abu Ghraib, this is the truest way of representing the essentially grotesque nature of the military adventure in Iraq.

The Corporate-Military Grip on Culture, Art

Posted on

Nick Turse via the Indypendent:

The military has enmeshed itself in American pop culture, infiltrating not only Hollywood, but everything else: from the video-game industry to bigtime sports to the world of online social networking.

Read the rest of this entry

Karl Rove and Dick Cheney in Hollywood and TV – at taxpayer expense

Posted on

Michael Weldon, interviewed by Ryan Lambie:

DoG: On your website you say that movies are more politicized now than at any time since WWII or the Cold War. Could you give any examples?

MW: This is a huge topic. Many movies, producers, and production companies, and some studios, stars and directors have close ties to the American DOD (Department Of Defence), arms dealers (American and Israeli), oil companies, and/or the ruling Republican Party and neocon Bush backers. The Hollywood/D.C. connection has existed for a long time to some extent but it’s stronger now than ever. After 9/11 Karl Rove met with studio heads and top producers and directors and convinced most of them to be part of the war on terror and to be more patriotic and pro FBI, CIA, Armed Forces…

If an American movie features spies, the military, and military hardware and does not explicitly criticized the government and the Iraq war – it has the full cooperation of the DOD. Some of our tax dollars actually go to providing military planes, boats, weapons, soldiers, advisors… to pro military movies that we pay too much to see – then go buy DVDs of! Many major movies have government agents and agencies right in the credits if you know where to look. Even most people who look back at WWII era movies or early Cold War era movies and realize that they were propaganda, don’t realize what’s happening now. Read the rest of this entry

The Never-Never Land of Corporate TV

Posted on

Not that M*A*S*H* was all that libratory in many ways, but compared to today…? 

Tom Dorsey

“M*A*S*H” started out as a sitcom, and the early chapters were the funniest by far. The show initially stayed away from the controversial dramatic plots that developed in later years when it almost bordered on being preachy sometimes.

The series was based on the best-selling novel and movie about the Korean War, but that war soon became a stand-in for the war in Vietnam.

The strongest anti-war scripts arrived long after the United States had left Korea. But the protest against the Vietnam War was still at a fever pitch when “M*A*S*H” first appeared, and not just with college kids and war protesters but with a majority of people who wanted the fighting to end and the soldiers to come home.

If the polls are right, that’s the same way most people feel today about the war in Iraq. But there’s nothing even remotely like “M*A*S*H” on television today.

Read the rest of this entry

Redacted, Valley of Elah, Rendition, and other Iraq war films

Posted on

No one wants to know by Simon Hattenstone

“Brian De Palma, Nick Broomfield and Paul Haggis have been called traitors and villains, their films branded ‘Bin Laden cinema’. They are desperate to tell the truth about what is going on in Iraq. But there seems little appetite for war films right now.”

Benjamin Percy, “Refresh, Refresh,” and Iraq war fiction

Posted on
– expanded –

What can be said of Iraq war fiction thus far? What of the art of partisan fiction? In an interview with Courtney E. Martin, Benjamin Percy notes:

I wrote about the [Iraq war] battleground at home [in 2005], something that had been neglected entirely. A few months ago I did a reading with Brian Turner, who served as an infantry leader in Iraq and who wrote a beautifully haunting book of poetry called Here, Bullet. When we were hanging out afterward, he clapped me on the back and said he thought what I was doing was important and he couldn’t understand why more people weren’t writing about the war. That was a great affirmation for me.

In fact the “Iraq war battleground at home” had not been “neglected entirely.” Noah Cicero wrote about it in an accomplished short novel The Human War published in 2003; Nicholson Baker’s Checkpoint was published in 2004; and my own novel Homefront was first [self] published with other fiction in January 2005 after not being picked up by a publisher through the end of 2003 and 2004.

Read the rest of this entry

Ishmael Reed – The Terrible Twos

Posted on

Ishmael Reed, interview with Wajahat Ali:

I predicted there would be a theocracy in the 80′s in my book The Terrible Twos, where I had a preacher running the White House in 1982.

You see, I think when you’re an independent intellectual you’re going to get it from all sides. I get it from the Left, the Right, the Middle. When I proposed that people said it was silly, but now we have Huckabee and Bush, and others. I mean they’re all still players. But, when I said it, they thought it was silly.